Security today often feels like constant firefighting. Most teams operate in reactive mode, responding to disruptions rather than anticipating them. You are overwhelmed, pulled from one crisis to the next. You’ve got to be on the ball, all the time.

Technology has helped criminals as much as it has helped security professionals. Every innovation becomes a tool for both sides, and the arms race isn’t slowing down. The more connected we become, the more opportunities attackers have. 

But what if you could be more effective at stopping tomorrow’s threats today?

What Is Future Proofing?

Future proofing is the practice of understanding the impact something might have in the future. That something could be a technology, a product, a behavior shift, or a change in the environment. Future proofing uses scenarios to see what impact is possible.

The core work of a futurist is to identify what the future could be. This starts with the acknowledgment that there is no single future. We track forces of change—social, technological, economic, and cultural—and use them to create stories about what the future could be. These stories are called scenarios. They aren’t predictions; they are explorations of what could happen.

Some of these future scenarios might seem more plausible to you, because they are tied to trends you observe in your day-to-day life. But the more familiar you are with a range of possible futures, the faster you’ll react when elements of those futures show up.

Future proofing uses scenarios to ask: If this future unfolded, what would it mean for us? What opportunities or vulnerabilities would appear? What actions could we take today to influence the trajectory? 

Innovations aren’t perfect either. New technologies that solve existing problems often introduce unintended consequences. A tool intended to make your life easier might expand a malicious actor’s attack surface. Take usernames and passwords, for example. This is how we’ve securely logged into websites and apps for decades, but written credentials have increasingly been targeted by threat actors. A past security tool has become a present-day security vulnerability. A product designed for one purpose ends up being used in a dozen unexpected ways. Future proofing is a framework that can uncover those consequences, as well as hidden benefits, before they surprise you.

Let’s explore two trends: the move from collaboration to isolation and the shift from globalism to nationalism.

Collaboration reduces risk. Clear frameworks define acceptable behavior for collaboration, making trust measurable. You know which activities signal trust and which don’t. The need for covert intelligence decreases because transparency is built into collaboration. Teams catch vulnerabilities faster through varied perspectives.

Isolation, on the other hand, breeds suspicion. Insider threats grow. Without shared frameworks, any interaction could become a threat. Broad innovation stalls and the response to major threats slows because everyone replicates work instead of collaborating.

This dynamic plays out between nations as well as between colleagues. The less global collaboration there is, the more that geopolitical threats and conflicts grow. Conversely, the more collaboration occurs with security services, the more secure organizations can become.

Future proofing enables us to navigate this scenario today. What would we change today to support the trends that create our desired future? If we want an internationally collaborative future, we can identify the actions to take today.

Future proofing strengthens specific cognitive muscles: pattern recognition, anticipatory thinking, and creative problem-solving. It increases your ability to react quickly and effectively because you’ve already rehearsed the future.

Future proofing helps you:

• Uncover blind spots before they become liabilities,
• Surface challenges before they become a big problem, and
• Build resilience because you’ve strengthened your ability to respond.

All of this expands your capacity. 

Future proofing can be done individually, in small groups, or in facilitated workshops. Bringing in a professional can save time and help teams quickly go deeper, but anyone can begin using these methods. The goal is to adopt a proactive stance toward change.

Practical Tools

Future proofing is a powerful tool to help you explore change directly. These practices strengthen your ability to see what’s coming, identify emerging problems, and test your responses before you are forced into crisis mode.

The first practice is trend identification—the discipline of looking at what’s changing today and understanding how those changes might shape tomorrow. The second is identifying future problems: asking how new technologies, behaviors, or systems might introduce vulnerabilities or unintended consequences. And the third is role-playing, where you drop yourself into a future moment and ask: If this problem emerged, how would we address it today?

Let’s put these ideas into action. Pick a way to take notes—this section is interactive.

Start by asking yourself three questions:

1. What is changing how you do your job today? Identify three things changing the way you work. Make at least one of them a technological shift and another a social shift.
   
   
2. How do you think you’ll do your job in the next five to 10 years? Based on the changes you identified in question 1, how could your job change, for the better and for the worse?
   
   
3. What would you change about the future to make your work easier or more effective? If your future state has problems, is there anything you can do to address those problems today? Are there things you can do today to make your future state more secure or your work more effective?
   
   

For example, in cybersecurity, a technological trend is the emerging potential of artificial intelligence (AI) agents to manage access control and monitor security protocols. On the human side, trust and collaboration continue to erode, making it harder to know what and whom to trust. Combining these, how would you know if an AI agent could be trusted or was being used by a threat actor?

Once you’ve mapped what’s changing, you can take it further with a simple adaptation of a childhood game: the Future-Proofing Mad Libs exercise. This is a way to turn your insights into a concrete scenario by filling in a few blanks. 

In the year [FUTURE DATE], [PRODUCT or TECHNOLOGY] becomes widely adopted. This causes the [SECURITY VARIABLE] to [INCREASE or DECREASE] to include [NEW VULNERABILITY]. Today, we can address this by [ACTION].

Let’s expand on your previous answers with questions specific to the Mad Libs.

• FUTURE DATE: What year in the future do I want to explore? (Start with 3–5 years.)
  
  
• PRODUCT or TECHNOLOGY: What product, technology, or emerging threat do I want to future-proof?
  
  
• SECURITY VARIABLE: What security variable does this technology affect?
  
  
• INCREASE or DECREASE: Does the variable increase or decrease security?
  
  
• NEW VULNERABILITY: What new vulnerability might appear because of that change?
  
  
• ACTION: Are there actions I can take today to address that vulnerability?
  
  

Plug your answers into the Mad Libs formula.

Here’s an example of applying this to research security services:

1. What’s changing how you do your job today?

• Regulatory: New compliance requirements driving system overhauls

• Tech: Agentic AI needed as talent pool thins; shift to shared service providers

• Social: Standardization across institutions; smaller schools outsource compliance

1. How will you work in 5‒10 years?

• Less process driven; more review of AI-gathered data

• More outreach, mentorship, and “evangelism” for cultural change

• Risk: Loss of institutional expertise and “bench depth”

1. What would you change?

• Problem: Centralized providers become nation-state targets; loss of local knowledge

• Opportunity: Cost-sharing; access to specialists, focus on research activities

• Action: Build auditable systems, independent oversight, knowledge transfer
  
  

So, here’s our Mad Lib result:

In the year 2030, shared research security services become widely adopted. This causes the attack surface for research security data to increase, as centralized service providers holding sensitive data for multiple institutions become attractive targets for nation-state actors.

This adoption creates new vulnerabilities: loss of institutional expertise (bench depth), third-party control of sensitive data, potential exposure of competitive advantages, and limited understanding of institution-specific contexts.

It also creates opportunities: cost-sharing, access to highly trained specialists, standardization across institutions, and the ability of smaller schools to focus on research rather than compliance.

Today, we can address this by:

• Tying research security data to technologies that track, secure, and create auditable records of who accesses sensitive information.
  
  
• Establishing independent oversight bodies to audit shared service providers.
  
  
• Creating regulatory frameworks that define liability and risk-sharing between institutions and providers.
  
  
• Developing clear succession plans to prevent loss of the "how and why" knowledge.
  
  
• Redefining research security skill sets toward communication and interpretation.
  
  

This exercise helps you identify where things might go wrong and explore steps you can take today. Watch the video below to walk through the process in more depth.

Caveats

Future proofing is not about predicting the future. It’s about taking action before a problem becomes a problem. No one can eliminate all risks. But by practicing these exercises, you can make some futures more secure.

And yes, the future will never unfold exactly as the scenarios describe. Just like going to the gym to build muscle, taking firearms training to build discipline, or completing a defensive driving course to prepare for unexpected situations, future proofing is a muscle you can train. You think about the future for the same reasons you do any kind of preparedness work: to build the familiarity and reflexes that increase your resilience.

Preparing for a single, predicted future where you put all your resources toward one possibility is a mistake. Preparing for a range of futures will make you flexible, adaptable, and harder to surprise.

Looking Ahead

When you adopt a futurist lens, you gain more capacity. You are able to react faster and more completely. You strengthen your own resilience. The “after” picture looks a lot like what happens when you’ve been training consistently: You make more confident decisions because your reflexes are sharper and your awareness is broader. 

If you are wondering how to start, work through the exercise in this article either by yourself or with key stakeholders at your organization. If you want to go deeper or explore this with a team, get in touch with me. 

When your next crisis hits—and it will—give yourself space afterward to reflect. Could any part of that situation have been anticipated? Would future proofing have changed your response or reduced the severity of the crisis? 

Future proofing helps you face what’s coming with more clarity, more capacity, and more confidence.

 

Heather Vescent is a futurist, researcher, and CEO of The Purple Tornado, a futures research and media studio exploring how emerging technologies transform society, identity, and human relationships. For over a decade, Vescent has helped clients like Disney, SWIFT, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security make sense of complex futures—from digital identity and cybersecurity to money, intimacy, and the Internet of Things. Her research has been featured in The New York Times, CNN, American Banker, CNBC, Fox, and The Atlantic. Through The Purple Tornado, she has produced 10 short films that visualize the future in the present tense—including “Fly Me to the Moon,” a speculative scenario about the future of money, nominated for a Most Important Futures Award.

Contact Heather Vescent at [email protected] or www.cybersecurityfuturist.com.

 

© 2026, Heather Vescent

 

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

1. From ‘Send Me the Video’ to Governance: How Privacy Makes Security Systems Defensible

2. Preventing Workplace Violence: Holistic Support Starts with Listening to Nurses

3. 3 Tools Providing Privacy Protections in Video Systems